Raymo raises valid
concerns when he states, “The unexamined quest for knowledge is hemmed with
peril.” He argues that science is not only beautiful, but also powerful and
dangerous; he describes the multifaceted and “piercing horns of the dilemma of
science” and cites radium, cesium, and autoluminescent tobacco as examples of
scientific breakthroughs with positive and negative powers. Raymo illustrates how both radium and
cesium cure and cause cancer, and how radium is also a potent energy source and a
“weapon of destruction.” He continues to explain that the feat of genetically
engineering a glowing tobacco plant also has its downsides. Though
biotechnology produces helpful things like vaccines, it is also extremely
dangerous since “gene(s) reproduce and copy (themselves) into the fabric of
life,” making them potentially indestructible.
Recently, in
biology, we also learned about biotechnology and gene splicing. It has many
possible benefits, like fixing genetic mistakes and keeping organisms healthy,
but it potentially enables eugenics as well. Antibiotics, too, have their
downsides; they have cured sicknesses, but they have also led to the rise of
resistant bacteria strains. Science clearly brings “mixed blessings.” Therefore, people must
exercise “a measure of restraint” when pursuing their scientific quests so as
not to upset the delicate balance of nature.
I like your reference to your bio class and how you provided both the pros and cons for gene splicing and antibiotics, really relates to raymo's piece well
ReplyDeleteNice post! I found it especially cool how you fluidly tied in the title of the piece.
ReplyDelete